REIV Hypocrisy - Cut Stamp Duty While Commissions Increase

Published 12 April 10 07:04 AM | Peter Mericka 

Peter Mericka B.A., LL.B OPINION
by Peter Mericka B.A., LL.B
Real Estate Lawyer
Qualified Practising Conveyancer Victoria
Director Lawyers Real Estate Pty Ltd

View Peter Mericka's profile on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter

 

The hypocrisy is astounding. Enzo Raimondo told the Herald Sun newspaper "If stamp duty rates are not reduced then anyone buying an average home will pay, as a percentage of the purchase price, a higher amount of stamp duty than they ever have before." What Enzo chooses to ignore is that real estate agent commissions have doubled, and none of the benefits of advances in technology have been passed on to consumers. Surely, after gorging itself on ever-increasing commissions, the real estate industry should also be taking smaller portions from the plate.Enough is enough!

In the Melbourne Herald-Sun newspaper (Monday 12 April, 2010), CEO of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria (REIV), Enzo Raimondo, made these observations:

"In 1999, the median price was $270,000 and stamp duty $11,860, or 4.4 per cent." (At the same time, commission charged by a real estate agent on the sale is generally 3 per cent of the purchase price)

"The median house price across Melbourne is now $540,500 and the stamp duty is $24,400 - about 4.5 per cent of the purchase price."(Similarly, the commission charged by a real estate agent on the sale remains around 3 per cent of the purchase price)

"If the stamp duty rates are not reduced then anyone buying an average home now will pay, as a percentage of the purchase price, a higher amount of stamp duty than they ever have before."

According to reporter Matt Johnston, "The Real Estate Institute of Victoria wants the State Government to cut the tax level, as it did in 2006."

The response of the government is that the GFC has affected government revenue. "The global financial crisis wiped over $220 million worth of stamp duty from our revenue in the first six months of this year alone", said a spokesman for Treasurer John Lenders.

 

Commission as a tax charged by real estate agents

The commission charged by real estate agents on the sale of real estate is not related to the effort or overheads of the real estate agent. Commission is charged as a percentage of the sale/purchase price of the property. Effectively, commission is a tax, charged by real estate agents.

There is a difference, however, between the tax charged by the government on property sales, and the tax charged by real estate agents on property sales. One impost is channeled into the coffers of the government for the purposes of funding public works etc., while the other is channeled into the pockets of real estate agents.

More about "REIV Hypocrisy - Cut Stamp Duty While Commissions Increase"...

FREE Download - Contract of Sale of Real Estate

Click on this link:

www.RealEstateDocuments.com.au

Lawyers Conveyancing - Peace of Mind

Lawyers Conveyancing is proud to sponsor the REIC

Comments

# Australian Real Estate Blog : REIV Hypocrisy – Cut Stamp Duty … « BlogsCentre said on April 13, 2010 4:28 PM:

PingBack from http://www.mypage.com/sites/blogscentre.com/2010/04/australian-real-estate-blog-reiv-hypocrisy-cut-stamp-duty/

# Al said on April 25, 2010 8:35 AM:

Fine to say that however how many real estate agents charge 3 percent these days?  I think you will find it far less.

# Peter Mericka said on April 25, 2010 8:40 AM:

That makes it all the worse, as the agents who charge far less than 3% make it obvious that those who charge 3% are simply parasites.

# cna training said on May 9, 2010 5:53 PM:

My cousin recommended this blog and she was totally right keep up the fantastic work!

# John said on May 21, 2010 2:05 PM:

Stop talking about percentage and talk about the dollars.

Start talking about the over supply  of Offices and new licensed agents who cant spell their names , or yours.

Raise the bar  for entry  as an agents rep.

ENFORCE  vendors to provide an independent  sworn valuation, Pest inspection and building inspection   and make it  a required part of the  section 32 vendor statement  provided by an entity  that  is at arms length  from the selling agent   or entity ,before an Authority can be given to an agent   ( or Lawyers Conveyancing and its  ilk.  )  Penalty $20k.

Penalty  for  accepting an engagement without the above $20k.

Then maybe you have a  real point to make in this industry .  

# Peter Mericka said on May 21, 2010 2:27 PM:

Hi John,

Wouldn't it be better to ditch the "nanny state", stop protecting the charlatans who pretend to sell real estate, and require that anyone who engages in the legal transaction known as "the sale of real estate" is appropriately qualified to provide the legal advice and to perform the legal work that gives effect to what the vendor and purchaser are trying to achieve?

New Comments to this post are disabled
The Real Estate Information Centre Sign in | Join

Search

Go

This Blog

Syndication

Feeds
    Subscribe to my feed, Australian Real Estate Blog

    Add to Google





    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add 'The Real Estate Blog' to Newsburst from CNET News.com

    Subscribe with Bloglines



    Add to My Yahoo!

    Blog Directory for Melbourne, Victoria

    Add to My AOL