Should conveyancing solicitors act for both parties?

Published 04 May 07 10:21 AM | Peter Mericka 

Tim O'Dwyer M.A., LL.B OPINION
by Tim O'Dwyer M.A., LL.B
Solicitor
Consumer Advocate
watchdog@argonautlegal.com.au

Real Estate Encyclopedia


 

The simple answer to the above question is no. But I guess many of us will, from time to time, act for both parties in conveyancing transactions. And, frankly, many of us will continue to do so until the governments in our various states and territories legislate against this practice to properly protect conveyancing consumers. Our professional and industry bodies may skirt around the edges with cautious codes of conduct, but sooner or later, the law makers will have to step in and outlaw what we collectively can't or won't.

In the meantime, our indemnity insurers insurers may, by various persuasive ways and means, more effectively bring about the end of this lucrative but risky practice long before it becomes illegal.

There will be many times when you should refuse referrals from sources such as real estate agents, other conveyancers and solicitors, and old clients because of actual or potential conflicts of interests. No solicitor (or conveyancer) can be independent if he or she is recommended in that way, particularly if the referral comes from the real estate agent.

More about "Should conveyancing solicitors act for both parties?"...

Lawyers Conveyancing - Peace of Mind

Lawyers Conveyancing is proud to sponsor the REIC

Comments

No Comments
New Comments to this post are disabled
The Real Estate Information Centre Sign in | Join

Search

Go

This Blog

Syndication

Feeds
    Subscribe to my feed, Australian Real Estate Blog

    Add to Google





    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add 'The Real Estate Blog' to Newsburst from CNET News.com

    Subscribe with Bloglines



    Add to My Yahoo!

    Blog Directory for Melbourne, Victoria

    Add to My AOL